Andrew Bourne 2 years ago. Unbelievable to me that there are so many clowns trying to discredit MGS when they are doing tests for US, the consumer. I got 20 more yards from it. Recently a comparison was made between the M2 and M1 with practically no difference, except when the M2 was adjusted, and could apparently be done so to a greater fine tuning, the results were statistically significant. Driver tech is now catching up. Is there a difference in shaft length between the two clubs? I may be mistaken, but over square metres looks like a significant difference in dispersion between the drivers.
|Date Added:||15 March 2004|
|File Size:||52.29 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Performs better than it looks.
How to Configure the Weight of a TaylorMade Golf R7 Quad Driver
I keep an r7 quad in the bag, and would probably be broken for life if something happened to it. Distance would be longer at the price of greater dispersion.
Would also like to break out dispersion data by handicap…bet the 10 to 15 guys are better off with the Quad! Rate this product Select rating 1 star rubbish 2 stars poor 3 stars average 4 stars very good 5 stars outstanding You must select a rating.
I can see launch angle affecting spin but not sure that the physics explain launch affecting ball speed. My kids always been one swing ahead of me. John Templet 2 years ago.
Are we really hitting the ball any farther, and if so, how much? What would you expect them to do? Simon Toplis 2 years ago. Shortside 2 years ago. Sorry, there was an error in submitting your review. However, for the fairness of the test, SQ could possibly benefit from a higher launch.
This looks like a rehash of mark crossfield comparing the m1 to the sldr s…however, in that instance, the sldr s not 9nky held its own, but bettered the m1 in real world scenarios. Distance does not equal improved superquax. That said, I do believe the head yields greater influence, but the shaft definitely matters.
I still use the R7 stiff and wouldnt change if for the world, so what i may be 14 yards behind the M1 but sometime you can be too tl Performance wise it was very good and moving the weights around did affect the trajectory. The shaft is also going to give tayllrmade some extra yards. But, do yourself a favor and try the new M2 demo. Darren Morgan 2 years ago. Like to see what the difference is for submph swingers looks like, where a large portion of golfers swing.
The newer M1 would still be longer and a bit less accurate. Cracked the face and was never able to find something that kept up to this day. Taylorrmade it seems most lower HC players bash them at every opportunity out of jealousy that a hight HC player can go out and play a decent round for their skill level.
Gx7 X-Metal Nov 21, 98 Comments.
With the Accra shaft, it is also more forgiving and accurate. Of course this is all dependant on my swing consistency but having said this; you have superqaud do something drastically wrong to at least hit it straight. Charlie 2 years ago. Accuracy was virtually the same. The M1 represents a distance gain of 5.
TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad
Please Help Great Club though. I was crushing it.
We simply test product and the data and results are what they are.